This is one of those posts you may rather not read. I'm waffling a bit to give the skim-reader time to decide that they don't want to be offended, disgusted etc.
Had enough time yet?? BTW, the digits are not out of prudishness but out of a desire to deter search engine spiders.
Spam mail comes in phases. Although the ones for various dodgy medication are perennial, there often seem to be bunch all at once for cheap mortgages (actually at higher rates than I'm paying....!), or for genuine fake Rolex watches. The past week has seen a whole bunch inviting me to view c(m-splattered girls or sp3rm-soaked models.
Let's briefly explore the fact that it is not actually possible to see sp3rm-soaked anything, because sp3rm are those tadpole-shaped gametes that require a decent microscope to view, whereas the visible ejaculated fluid is s3m3n.
A few weeks ago Channel 4 ran a series about women who work in the porn industry. I didn't watch it but, perhaps foolishly, read a TV review in a reputable national newspaper. One of the programmes featured a woman whose job was go to parties and let men ejaculate over her. Perhaps I am being pedantic but I suspect that probably makes her closer to a prostitute than a porn actress. The point of the story is that sometimes the venue has no shower and she has to get dressed and go home by public transport.
I can understand the attraction for a man to ejaculate onto a woman - first, there's the physical pleasure and then there's the visual pleasure.
But I absolutely cannot understand the attraction of seeing some other man's product photographed (or Photoshopped) onto an anonymous *model*. But if my inbox is any judge, there's clearly a big call for it...
