This post comes with a Parental Advisory and a Rating of 18
It's Friday, it's time to resurrect the regular Strange Search Requests...
I'm serious about that Parental Advisory, BTW.
- recognising trees - usually, they're tall brown things with a pretty green cluster on top
- www couples into animal sex seeking male to assit - why start with 'www' when, by definition, they're searching the www?
- NAMES OF CELEBRITIES THAT WEAR RUBBER GLOVES - it's one of those vital questions that need answering. But I'm wondering, do they mean all the time, which would be weird, even for celebrities. Do they mean, as part of their celebrityness, in which case I would start with the stars of medical dramas. Or do they mean those who wear them for household chores. It's a funny one, isn't it. I know I'm not a celebrity, but I wear rubber gloves even for washing up. But there are other people who wear them only if they're using strong detergents such as bleach. And I suppose there are people - celebrities and mortals - who feel a need to wear them when cleaning up after children and animals. It's pretty much essential when moving dead birds from the shower room or - Anna Little Red Boat look away now - dead mice from
halfway up the stairsthe kitchen floor. And why the CAPS LOCK key? - i want to see 19 gay men doing oral sex - why 19?
- debate mozart beethoven who has a more difficult life deaf niece went away drinking always fami - Mozart was deaf? That's been covered up for a long time. I'm sure now they both have a beautiful (after)-life* knowing, in a metaphysical sense, how much they are revered. I bet they're bloody surprised, too. And chuffed.
- Walking holidays for ugly people - this made me cry a little. It's horrible to think that someone believes themself so ugly that they have to seek out niche products. I imagine the sub-text is actually 'find me an activity where the participants will not be deterred by my ugliness, and maybe I can find true love'. As beauty is skin deep, so is ugly. Some of the nastiest people I have met are beautiful, whilst some of the ugliest have been truly nice people. I am thankful to be moderately attractive - on a good day, to some people. It's the way to be.
Finally, the desperate search for celebs, also-rans and wannabes 'nude', 'naked', 'topless' is relentless. And, I suppose, a normal healthy human pursuit. But it's still bothering me.
Very many of the sought after celebs would not, never ever, pose nude - some eg Jonny Wilkinson famously so. Others, eg Anna Netrebko, I understand a body suit was involved. And I can see the desire to see various beautiful famous women nude.
But there is a fundamental problem with male celebs. Even if they were to pose totally starkers - and, frankly, how many genuine celebs actually do, it still wouldn't be enough. I don't think I particularly want a picture of any celeb man, (or non celeb, for that matter) er hum, relaxed. And the alternative?
Well, I have to say I find the current state of obscenity laws, in the UK at least, to be nonsensical. A few weeks ago Channel 4 showed a fairly interesting documentary about the history of pr0n, but there was a great deal of pixellation. I guess the laws are made by men with an inherent fear of unfavourable comparison. But it creates an atmosphere where something that is entirely normal, natural and often beautiful becomes unmentionable.
Many years ago, with a group of female friends, almost certainly over a bottle or two or vino, we had a 'discussion' and a consensus emerged that the first viewing can be quite a surprise to many young women. Additionally, many men get very worried about comparisons, when - for straight men, at least - the only comparison is relaxed. When, in reality, I think men can be divided into 'showers' and 'growers'. (But I think we've had that particular discussion before: key words - Frank Sinatra, Enrique Iglesias.)
* YMMD
